Research

2020

Prices and Global Inequality: New Evidence from Worldwide Scanner Data

Guenter W. Beck and Xavier Jaravel

Abstract How do price dynamics affect inequality worldwide?Despite extensive research, this question remains debated due to potential biases in existing measures of prices and expenditure patterns across countries. To address this issue, this paper introduces a new global scanner database. To address existing biases in the measurement of prices and expenditure patterns across countries, this paper introduces a new global scanner database. This dataset provides harmonized barcode-level data on expenditures and prices for consumer packaged goods in thirty four countries, including developing (e.g., Brazil, China, India, and South Africa) and developed countries (e.g., the United States, Russia, and most European countries). The first part of the analysis focuses on the relationship between prices and inequality within countries over time. We find that inflation inequality has been a worldwide phenomenon in recent years. In most countries, inflation has been lower and product variety has increased faster in product categories catering to higher-income households. The second part of the paper builds purchasing power parity (PPP) indices using millions of identical barcodes across countries. We find that standard biases in the calculation of price indices (including quality bias, new goods bias and substitution bias) do not vary significantly with the level of economic development. But we show that PPP indices between countries vary widely depending on which household income serves as the reference level. For example, the PPP index between Italy and Germany is below one for low-income households but above one for high-income households. Consequently, we develop non-homothetic PPP indices to characterize differences in purchasing power along the household income distribution in all countries. To address the limitation that only a subset of total expenditures is observed, we use shifts in Engel curves (extending the Hamilton (2001) method and building on recent work by Almas et al. (2019) and Atkin et al. (2020)). To directly check the external validity of our findings, we supplement the scanner data with more aggregate data on prices and expenditures from national statistical agencies covering the full consumption basket of consumers. Overall, the findings indicate that using micro data on prices and expenditures is crucial to accurately describe patterns of inclusive growth worldwide. We provide publicly available statistics on a companion website, which other research teams can use to build on and extend our analysis.

2019

Guenter W. Beck, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Natalia Zabelina

Abstract Studies employing micro price data to examine the extent of international goods market integration tend to find that borders imply arbitrage-impeding transaction costs, inducing market segmentation. Within monetary unions, these effects are found to be very minor though, at least when online prices are considered. However, analyzing household scanner price data from three euro area member states, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, we document that households face (and pay) significantly different prices for identical goods across these countries in the vast majority (around 75%) of cases considered. For regions within countries, as a counterfactual, however, no evidence for such effects exists. Employing cross-border shopping information, we are able to draw direct conclusions about the question of integration of markets for a substantial number of goods. In addition, we can also derive a measure of border costs for most of them. For goods, for which no cross-border shopping take place, we provide a lower bound for border costs in the majority of cases. In line with existing evidence, our findings suggest considerable heterogeneities in border costs. Median values generally range between 15% and 20% (of the price of a good) for exact border cost estimates and between 18% and 20% for the derived lower bounds. Considering the distribution of values obtained suggests that most values lie in a range of ±40%. Since our data set comprises purchase information from all major retailers present in a given market, we are also able to examine the role of retailer heterogeneity for cross-border price gap estimates. Differences in retailer composition turn out to be fairly small, however. Grouping goods by various characteristics reveals that goods purchased more often tend to exhibit somewhat bigger border estimates. Considering the price or the goods category, however, does not yield any conclusive insights.